Powerlines, Property Owners, Public Utilities and The Power of Eminent Domain
July 10th, 2009




‘;
}
s0 = ‘
‘;
if(document.getElementById(’ad-3′)) {
document.getElementById(’ad-3′).innerHTML = s0;
}
}
if(google_ads.length > 3) {
var s1 = ”;
s1 += ‘
‘;
for(i = 3; i = google_ads.length) { break; }
s1 += ‘
” + google_ads[i].line1 + ‘
‘ +
” + google_ads[i].line2 + ‘ ‘ + google_ads[i].line3 + ‘
‘ +
‘‘ + google_ads[i].visible_url + ‘
‘;
}
s1 = ‘
‘;
if(document.getElementById(’ad-4′)) {
document.getElementById(’ad-4′).innerHTML = s1;
}
}
}
In the old days, railroad agents had the responsibility of buying up land from the Native Americans for right of ways upon which they could build their tracks. One story tells of a rather shrewd Chief who understood the situation well. This Chief was approached by a railroad agent who offered to buy a particularly poor stretch of land:
Buy my land? . . . Sure, me sell for $50,000, said the Chief.
$50,000! Why that land is no good for planting or pasture. It is just no good for anything! the agent exclaimed.
The Chief grunted, It heep good for railroad. [i]
While this anecdote may seem silly, Kimble County landowners can take from it two important lessons: The first of these lessons is that, like the railroad, the LCRA power transmission lines are probably coming through Kimble County whether we like it or not. While we are only talking about easements and need not fear the total divestment of our ownership rights that the Native Americans went through, a taking is a taking. Public utility companies like the LCRA have the immense power of eminent domain and condemnation bolstering them.
Eminent Domain is common law principal given statutory strength at the State legislature level. It empowers government and quasi-government entities to take any U.S. citizens land for public use. The only real restrictions placed upon this power lie in the Takings Clause of 5th Amendment, which states that private property shall not be taken for public use, without just compensation[ii]
This article is not some sort of call to arms supporting legislative reform. If that is a cause you intend to support, I suggest you take a look at materials provided by the various landownership rights groups or other like-minded organizations around the country.
Rather, what this article hopes to accomplish is to provide helpful tips and background information to Kimble County landowners so that they may better prepare for what is coming and hopefully obtain the best outcome possible.
This brings me to the second lesson we may take from the wise Chief.
Landowners must be aware of and prepared to defend the value of their land. As a property owner, or the “big chief” on your land, can you simply accept what the railroad/LCRA agent thinks the easement over your land is worth? Sure and indeed your life will be simpler that way. However, their offer may not be what you feel entitled to and may be much less than what you could receive with some additional preparation.
Understand that eminent domain/condemnation proceedings are adversarial in nature. This means that even while you may or may not ultimately be able to prevent the installation of the transmission line over your property, you certainly have a voice in determining what the 5th Amendment’s just compensation will be for you. Preparation is key, you are going to be dealing with a team of professionals trained by the LCRA to adhere to a budget and a schedule. Your rights and compensation are NOT their priority.
It is apparent that there is much confusion amongst the public as to how eminent domain/condemnation actions actually work and are going to transpire. Familiarizing yourself with the progression will enable you to better make better decisions when it comes time. The following five steps are a drastically abbreviated schedule of how a normal eminent domain/condemnation matter will likely proceed.
1: If it hasn’t happened already, the LCRA will contact you and request permission to inspect, survey, and appraise your property.
2: An LCRA representative presents to you a valuation of your property and makes an offer.
3: This offer is time sensitive and must be accepted within a specific time frame. If you do not respond or if you reject the offer outright, the LCRA will then likely file their condemnation lawsuit against you.
4: Once this happens the Court selects three special commissioners to conduct a hearing on the matter. The special commissioners will be disinterested property owners that reside in Kimble County. At this hearing, you are able to present evidence to the panel in support of your valuation, cross-examine LCRA appraisers, and generally explain to them why the LCRA valuation is too low. Once the presentation of evidence is conclude, the Commissioners make a determination of value and make that figure their “special award.”
5: This “special award” is not the end game unless you are satisfied with it. If unhappy with the commissioners award, you have a short period of time in which you may object to it and appeal. In this new trial both parties start over from the beginning, and the case proceeds as if the commissioners’ hearing never happened. You will be able to choose whether a judge or a jury decides your case.
As you can see, it’s really all just about money. The steps I have outlined are your opportunities to have a say in how much you are going to receive. Essentially, you have three primary options: come to negotiated agreement with LCRA, accept the special commissioners’ award, or have a judge or jury decide how much you should receive.
Make no mistake; property valuation can be very complicated in the eminent domain context. Perhaps you have sold a property in the past; maybe you even contested the tax valuation of your own home. The appraisals and valuations in these situations are very simple calculations compared to those in used condemnation matters. Property valuation evidence in condemnation proceedings must adhere to and reflect a body of condemnation law hewn out over decades in Texas Appellate Courts. It would be wise to seek professional assistance early in the game.
Fundamentally, in valuating easements in the transmission line context, we are really actually talking about de-valuation. How much less is my property worth now that there are power lines running through it, and is that amount of devaluation also the amount of money I could be compensated with and be happy? To set the tone, throw out some actual numbers, and give you a general idea of what sort of devaluation I am referring to, consider the following:
In 1997, the LCRA actually commissioned a study to figure out just how much that its power transmission lines affected the value of the properties they cross.[iii] The geographical area studied was around Georgetown, Texas. This study was completed by an appraiser who the LCRA had hired to do all of the appraisal work on an easement acquisition project very similar to the one proposed for Kimble County. The only difference is that this study was done for a much smaller 138 Kv transmission line than the double circuit 345 Kv lattice tower we are facing today.
In this study, completed by an appraiser paid by LCRA, undeniable devaluation was found. It concluded that a transmission line easement has less than a 10% impact on price, and in most instances, less than a 5% impact on price.[v] Importantly, this is a possible 10% overall impact on price for the entire property.[vi] Put simply, if you owned targeted land around Georgetown around the millennium, the LCRA turned your $500,000.00 property into a $450,000.00. - $475,000.00 property.
For the land directly underneath and near the line, the study concluded:
“It is concluded that the area located within an electric transmission line easement has a 90% diminution in value due to the presence of the easement. [and] [i]t is concluded that an area 200 feet wide adjoining the proposed easement has some diminished value. The extent of the diminished value can be dependent on various factors which would include the location of the easement relative to the whole tract, and the physical characteristics of the remainder.[vii]
This is, of course, is ten year old data from a single source that only considers strict real estate values. Additionally, this study was conducted for much smaller transmission lines; and should be considered only as a point of reference.
Much has changed since 1997, but is my opinion that it has changed in favor of the landowner rather than the LCRA. To arrive at a more fair devaluation figure, one must start with a strict real estate calculation like the above, and then add other important considerations.
One such consideration is our land-based businesses. Kimble County landowners are ranchers, farmers, and hunting lease operators. To varying extents LCRA transmission lines will harm these businesses. A business is property, and as with real estate, the takings clause of the U.S. and Texas Constitution require that compensation be paid to the owners when it is taken or damaged for public use.[viii] These are separate harms from the real estate devaluation and landowners need to be compensated for them as well.
Then there are considerations that affect valuation that have less to do with you as a businessperson, and more to do with the business that LCRA can do with its easement across your land.
The LCRA is not only in the power distribution business. They are also in the data transmission business. In today’s digital, hyper-connected age, right of way easements are hot commodities for those industries that rely on hard line data connections. These lines transmit data involving everything from the plain old internet to national security. If you aren’t careful, you could find yourself legally bound to watch silently as the LCRA installs much more than just the power transmission lines across your property. The question is: are you as a landowner entitled to any of that extra value that may be coming into the LCRA in the form of communication line leases to non-governmental third partys?
Texas Courts haven’t ruled sufficiently on the matter; conventional statistical methodologies say yes. The reason I am bringing it up is not so much to advocate for it being a huge valuation issue in Kimble County eminent domain proceedings, but more to stress the importance of know exactly what rights you are giving up and are being compensated for.
As you can see, there is a wide range of issues that can come into play in these eminent domain matters and many can become very complicated. As a landowner dealing with the LCRA, you will be meeting with a sophisticated group of people who deal with this subject every day, all day long. You are at an inherent disadvantage and the only way to overcome it is by educating yourself.
[i] The Appraisal Journal, October, 1978, pp. 514-515 (Quoted from the April 1963 Newsletter of the American Right of Way Association)
[ii] U.S. CONSTITUTION, Amend. V.
[iii] Larry Kokel, MAI. Impact of Electric Transmission Lines on Value. (Study prepared for LCRA). 1997.
|
Adam N. Rieck Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Adam_Rieck |
Posted in Real Estate Law Title | No Comments »
Tracking Tenants in Rent Arrears
July 6th, 2009The buy to let boom of just a few years ago put many people in to the bracket of Landlord for the first time, property prices rising along with increases in standards of living and dilemmas over pensions meant an increased level of people turning to property as a long term investment and what better way to get an instant return on your investment than to rent it out. This situation continued until around March 2008, this was the turning point and the beginning of what has become known as the credit crunch.
Now many landlords are facing a difficult situation with tenants who can no longer afford their rent due to loss of work and are unfortunately seeing absconding as the only way out.
Tracking tenants who are in rent arrears can be a long process especially if the landlord has not obtained enough information about the tenant to make tracing them possible.
There are many things that you can do to avoid this situation although most of these are admittedly pro active to be done before the tenant moves in, the most important ones are
Making sure your tenant signs a contact - don’t be afraid to put in the contract that you will take further action and use their information to trace them and collect any outstanding rent.
Try and get a guarantor for the tenant who will guarantee that rent is paid in the event that the tenant cannot pay. Again you must put in the contract that you will use their own information against them in the event that they do not pay.
Try and obtain references for the tenant, a tenant who cannot produce references is best left alone.
Make sure you get as much information as possible including their work details, although the loss of their job might be the cause of the rent arrears, it maybe that they still work there on reduced hours.
If they are younger people try and obtain parents address, this is cynical but younger people who can’t afford to live alone tend to return to the family home.
Ask for a date of birth, mobile numbers, previous address and middle name
Ask the tenant to credit score the tenant, you can do this to see what their credit rating is, also inform the tenant that you will use credit information to locate them, you need them to sign in agreement of this so it must be in the contract.
All these things will not make the tenant more likely to pay but in the event that they do stop paying they will arm a trace company with the necessary information to successfully locate your tenant.
If you can give all this information to the trace company your chances of finding a current up to date address for your tenant is high, around 90%. If you only have limited information this is reduced to no more than 20%, if they have a common name it is even lower.
Most trace companies work on a no find no fee basis so if they don’t find the information you are looking for then you don’t pay; you should not have to pay any money upfront. It is worth pointing out that it does take time for information about the tenant to appear on trace databases so it is worth using a company that has trained staff to investigate the matter fully rather than system only tracing, unfortunately the cost of the trace has little to do with the quality so try to speak to the company in question to see what they do.
Posted in Real Estate Law Title | No Comments »
You May Have Release Equity in Your House in an IVA
July 4th, 2009What is equity? This question keeps cropping up regularly. People who are worried about whether to opt for bankruptcy or go for IVA are not clear about the options that are available to them and what will happen to their home.
Posted in Real Estate Law Title | No Comments »
The Value of a Real Estate Lawyer
July 3rd, 2009Among the lesser known of the legal arts, real estate lawyers are not considered nearly as quickly as divorce lawyers, criminal defense attorneys or even personal injury lawyers. During many instances in a person’s life, he or she may consider hiring a lawyer for a variety of reasons. Buying a home or piece of land is normally not one of those instances for most people until the time comes to review the documents associated with the process.
Posted in Real Estate Law Title | No Comments »
Can You Get Paid If the Government Closes Your Street to Highway Access?
July 2nd, 2009This is an interesting question that comes up often in eminent domain law in one primary scenario. Let’s say you are the owner of a Taco Bell in Seattle, Washington and you have built your Taco Bell on a street that is right off Highway 527. To get to your Taco Bell, people simply slow down or stop, make a turn onto your street, and travel the one block drive to your store. And business is good. That is, until the Seattle department of transportation comes along and wants to change everything. They have analyzed the highway corridor that contains your business and have decided, because of ever increasing vehicle counts, that highway access needs to be restricted to interchanges spaced out at one mile intervals. Which is fine, except they didn’t pick your intersection for an interchange. What was once a one block drive from the highway will be, once the highway project is complete, at least half a mile - and you can bet people will be building plenty of places to eat right off the interchange. You call the Seattle Department of Transportation and demand to be paid for the lost business and lost property value you’ll surely experience once the project is built, but they dismiss your complaint and tell you they don’t owe you anything.
As a Seattle, Washington eminent domain attorney who has worked for both landowner and the government, this is a scenario seen often. And the answer, for the most part, is that the loss is not compensable. The SDOT is correct in turning down your request for compensation. But how can this be? They are clearly diminishing my property value and taking my business, you might be saying to yourself. Well, three concepts are working against you in this scenario.
The first concept working against the property owner is that business profits are not a compensable item under the law, generally. This is because the law of eminent domain is not in place to compensate people for lost business profits, but for lost land. The loss of business is just a tragic byproduct of losing property (or access), but the law sees businesses as something not tied to any property - the thinking is that if your business is successful in one place it can be successful in another. It’s a troubling concept if you are a business owner, but the fact is, this is the way you will be treated.
The second concept working against you, the Seattle property owner, is the idea of “police power.” Police power is a constitutional concept that bestows upon the government the authority to regulate pretty much anything if it involves the health, safety, and public welfare of its citizens. This theory holds for road construction as well. So, in the above example, Seattle will argue, successfully, that the closure and limitation of access to interchanges is done in order to preserve the safety and welfare of drivers on that road. And, assuming they have traffic studies and things of that nature to back up what they are saying, the Court will take them at their word. There is a very narrow exception to this if your property is significantly injured separately from the general damage incurred by other property owners in similar circumstances. But this doesn’t apply to traffic flow of cars to fast food restaurants - traffic flow is seen generally as an exercise of the government’s police power.
Finally, in order for your Seattle condemnation attorney to successfully argue for a taking under eminent domain law, they would have to show that some property interest of yours has been taken. A loss in the value of property in and of itself is not viewed as a taking under condemnation law (generally). In other words, if the SDOT is not physically taking or touching something of yours, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to allege inverse condemnation.
So, the short answer to the question of compensability after a long explanation is that generally you, the Seattle property owner, would not be eligible for money in the above scenario. But, let me add, that if you are in this situation, it can’t hurt to contact a Seattle eminent domain attorney to look at your case. There are exceptions to every rule. Maybe your property is one of them.
Posted in Real Estate Law Title | No Comments »
SPEEDY SALES - They Can Keep Your Cash Flow Moving
July 1st, 2009In the midst of the credit crunch the old adage is truer than ever - cash is king.
Without a healthy cash flow, your business could stall and ultimately splutter to a standstill.
Every sale feels like a milestone in today’s tough market place, but after the buzz has worn off, it is more important than ever to make sure you qualify the purchaser. Ensuring that mortgage finance and an appropriate deposit is available is proving critical with mortgage lenders having tightened their loan to value lending criteria considerably over the last six to twelve months.
It is also vital that the purchaser and the vendor have the correct legal representation. A good conveyancer should ensure searches and title checks are completed quickly, and this can make the difference between achieving a sale and it falling through.
Given the falling number of transactions it is imperative to look after every element of the legal process, starting with the choice of conveyancer. In this market place there are no excuses for poor service. RICS figures show that some 1.2 million transactions were registered at the Land Registry throughout 2007, which dropped to 600,000 in 2008. The vast majority of conveyancers, like estate agents, have been affected by the down turn, so should be working even harder to provide a great service and assure repeat business.
Communication throughout the sale process is of paramount importance. Large conveyancing practices are leading the way with online case tracking systems, which allow estate agents and their clients to case track the progress of transactions. This shift to e-conveyancing will gain pace over the course of the next few years, and can speed up the process significantly.
However this is not a substitute for the reassurance associated with a quick telephone call. Telephone contact with the client is needed at key stages throughout the transaction to keep the process moving. Conveyancers and estate agents need to ensure that clients have a point of human contact, preferably the same person, every time they telephone and that calls are always returned promptly.
Timing is critical to transaction success in today’s market place. Any transaction moving into a 90 day period between the date the sale was agreed and exchange of contracts is likely not to complete. The consistent devaluation of property on a month by month basis, together with the tightening of mortgage finance means that property deals that are not concluded quickly are in jeopardy of not concluding at all. Conveyancers were recording attrition rates of up to 45% throughout 2008/9, in comparison to 25% in 2007. Conveyancers should aim to exchange within eight weeks of instruction at the latest.
Don’t forget that the commission to be earned from peripheral products such as legal referrals are important. Estate agents can earn anything from £100 to £400 per transaction from conveyancing referrals, and such payments can seriously improve your cash flow.
Completing sales quickly will mean your commission and fees are where they should be - in your pocket. Fast-paced conveyancing can be a real boost in a market where sales are scarce, and simple steps like keeping an eye on the speed of the process and keeping the lines of communication open at all times will help you achieve them.
Posted in Real Estate Law Title | No Comments »







